So, the lady in florida has finally been allowed to die, I'm sad that's she's dead but I'm also glad that she was allowed to die. That she can no longer be a political tool, only a mytered person, which isn't all that much better.

 

Anyway;

 

I was writting to you with this great idea, and I did something and deleated the whole thing. Which I could take as a sign from a bove or below or where ever, but I'm not going to.

 

In a city near where I live there are about four large empty building's, three of which are centerally located.

 

One, which is more central than the others, I beleive, was a boys and girls club. And if you follow my advice it would be bought and turned into something diffrent. Than it won't just be wasted space or collapse on itself.

 

It should be a homeless shelter of sorts. I understand that their are probubly plenty of those in the city. But a place where people (particularly families) can come and say rent a small apartment, or whatever for however much they can afford. A place where people can sleep, eat, shower and all of that.

 

Like long ago people can come their every day looking for a job (perhaps on a day by day basis) and looking to hirep people for jobs. One day someones working at picking berries and the next day their helping to cean a streat or park after a storm or winter. Perhaps their helping people move or this or that. There are plenty of jobs that are there one day and gone the next.

 

Can collecters could go their to deposite their cans, and receive a bit extra for their troubles. Too many people just throw away what should be recicled, and the cna collecters help the earth. Thus more things are recicled and they'd be a bit better off.

 

The place could work like a bank in some respects. Part of everyones pay (if they worked out of the place) could be placed in an acount for them. Which they have total control over, but (as part of the service) could receive finantial help. Not only that but help so that they can earn money, and save it so that their back on their feet.

 

Of I could do this the first thing I'd do (after I bought the place) would be to hire people who need jobs (day by day or not) to fix the place up. Make a day care for people who need day care and can't afford it, night care as well. Bath rooms and showers. Kitchen and cafeteria and all that. I'd also have them make small apartments. Places that people can rent, for as much as they can afford even if the place should cost more than that, and live. A waystation on their way to true independence and all.

 

Unfortunetly I'm going cross eyed at the moment from my head ache, so one I'm free of that affliction I'll be back once again.

I don't know if any of you have noticed all the fuss over the lady in Florida. She's pretty much a vegtable except her eyes and her husband wants to take out her feeding tube so that she'll die. (By starvation, which she would have done long ago without the feeding tube) But her parents don't want her to be killed (Which it is, except you've got to ignore all the technalogical advances we've made since human's evolved.) The Florida court (I beleive) gave permission to take her feeding tube out and of course the parents are fighting. They're trying to take it to the supream court (Who've refused the case several times.)

 

Now, as if that's not bad enough. But Bush (Our wonderful wise president who's getting all kinds of people killed and all other kinds of terrible things!) has finally come back from his vacation early (Which he didn't do when there was the tsunami, which is much more an issue. Particularly since it's a natural one and involves loads more deaths!(Which doesn't mean that it's more important nessisarily. But in this case it does!)) And to get back all the anti-abortion religious people he's saying that she shouldn't be allowed to die.

 

The right to live, don't get me wrong most of the time I beleive the right to live is wonderful. But not if all you can do is blink and lie there as a vegtable.

 

So what the hell!!!! (And I very much mean that word!) do we have the death penalty? If we're so upset about people dying natural deaths (In unnatural circumstances) than why can't we be so conserned about people dying unnatural deaths in unnatural circumstances?

 

It is most definitly and unrefutably wrong!!!!!

 

Example: The only time that Maine executed a person (By hanging. And I forget why he was executed, sorry) they beleived him guilty. But than after he'd been killed it came to light that he was compleatly innocent. The laws were changed so that the death penalty was illegal (Yah!!!! Wahoo!!! Though I feel terrible for the poor man. Just as I feel bad for all the other people killed!!! I do!) and no more people are executed in Maine.

 

Another example: There was recently a man in Texas. (I beleive this is how it goes, I'm sorry if I'm wrong.) He was convicted of raping someone (his wife?) and than killing her. DNA tests later proved that he didn't rape her, so the logical mind would beleive that he hadn't killed her either. But the Texas courts refused to listen to him or anyone else, they were too busy (Doing who knows what! Which wasn't at all important compaired to saving an innocent man's life!) to do anything about it an now he's dead. probobly freid in an electric chair.

 

Now tell me that isn't wrong? Okay, okay. I know most people don't care. They love juicy stories about stars doing terrible things, and serial killers and murders. They love to hear who they were sentenced to be killed. But they don't want to the killed, or accused of being the killer. If their in danger it's not so good. And if their life is in danger (Not just from the killer, but from the court room) it's not good at all.

 

How many people who didn't do what they were accused of have been killed, or even sentenced to jail time.

 

Yet another example: A man was sent to jail for raping a woman. 11 years later he finally got the DNA test that he wanted done to prove his innocents. He was proven innocent and set free. But, he wasn't really free. (I beleive this is how it goes.) His wife had been getting child support since he was convicted, being unable to care for the child and herself without other help. Now, after he was set free the state wanted all the money that they'd given to the family for child support back because he should have been out in the world working. How unfair is that? Not only are 11 years of his life terrible, because of something he didn't do, but he's still got to pay for something that isn't his fault.

 

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong!!!!!!!!!!

 

I could go on forever. But I'll be frank (Not Frank Burns, just frank, honest and all that) I don't beleive that anyone has a right to kill others, in anyway, directly or indirectly. I don't even eat meat. (For a diffrent reason entirely, but that's okay.) It's decidedly wrong, and we shouldn't tollerate it.

 

Espessually as we're supposed to be be the great US of A. And stand for freedom and justice for all. (While we stand for a free powerplay between out president. Probubly trying to prove his daddy wrong and prove that he's right and good all that those crappy lies.)

 

Wouldn't it be better to have them rot in solitary confinment for their whole lives until they die. (First of all, if their innocent the wrong can be somewhat righted.) And they'd be alone with their mind. After a while their going to start thinking, weather they think the right thing or the wrong thing (which I don't have any buisness deciding. But I do anyway.) Perhaps over time they'll realize what they did was wrong, perhaps they'll just go insane with their own mind as their only company. Who know, but I'd certainly rather find out that than another innocent person was killed.

 

Once someone quoted the Bible at me. He said that it was black and white. I have to argue. It's full of contradictions. Which I don't even get into here. But I will get into one thing.

 

One of the comandments says that Thous shalt not kill. And that's what the man said, it was black and white. Everyone knows what it means.

 

But it doesn't, it isn't and all! Thou shalt not kill what? Human's? Animals? Plants? Insects? What? I could sya that's why I don't eat meat. It isn't. I could say that's why I feel guilty swatting flies and other bugs. I could say that's why I try and never wear animal hide. I could even say that's why I'm against the death penatly.

 

And I would be a terrible liar! It's not the reason at all. It's just an added argument in stone soup. I beleive (Me personally) that all life has a right to live. Yes, I have killed and kill continue to kill bugs. Particularly when they're bothering me. I will continue to kill plants. I like to eat, alot and plants are what I eat. But I will argue that killing people and animals is decidednly wrong.

 

I know most people don't beleive that their animals. (My fourth grade teacher flunked my report on humans which I'd written were animals, because they are.) We have intelligence, but so do animals. We stand on two feet, so do birds. Hell, fish don't stand at all, does that make them better than us? We just compleatly change the earth in ways that other animals don't do, and probubly can't/

 

Which is getting way off the subject.

 

So now we're back on.

 

If all life is sacrad, than who can we kill people, how can we kill each other, how can we kill anything or anyone?